Romania

Basic Country Information

  • Region: Europe & North America
  • Income Group: High Income
  • Population: 19.07 million
  • GNI per Capita: 20072 USD
  • Urban population: 55% of total
  • Life expectancy at birth: 76 years
  • Human Development Index (HDI): 0.85

How does Romania control corruption?

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Integrity Transparency
Country’s Score 7.13/10 18/20
World Rank 44/119 5/143
Regional Rank 29/33 5/33
Income group Rank 36/53 /53

Index of Public Integrity

IPI Score: 7.13 / 10
The IPI score is the mean of the six components scores, which result from the standardization and normalization of original source data to range between 1 and 10 using a min-max-transformation, with higher values representing better performance.
Components Component Score
(max=10)
World
Rank
Income Group
Rank
Regional
Rank
Opportunities for Corruption
Administrative Burden 0 /119 /53 /33
Trade Openness 0 /119 /53 /33
Administrative Transparency 8.5 14/119 9/53 9/33
Online Services 6.4 72/119 42/53 31/33
Budget Transparency 8.29 42/119 20/53 15/33
Constraints on Corruption
Judicial Independence 4.45 73/119 40/53 29/33
Freedom of the Press 6.79 39/119 29/53 25/33
E-Citizenship 8.36 26/119 26/53 21/33

Opportunities are permanent enabling circumstances for corruption. Empirical evidence exists that administrative discretion (lack of administrative transparency and poor regulation) combined with unaccountable resources (non-transparent public finance, both from domestic sources and international aid) create opportunities for corruption.

Constraints are permanent disabling circumstances of corruption. They encompass the legal response of authorities as well as the response by society (a free press and digitally enabled citizens organized as civil society or as individual voters).

Societies manage to control corruption if they find the right balance between opportunities and constraints.

Read more in the methodology.

 

 

For Budget Transparency, last value available is for 2019. For Online Services, last value available is for 2020. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. For the E-citizenship sub-components, last values available are also for 2020, and missing values in any of the sub-indicators were replaced with the latest available data point.

No IPI data for Romania

Transparency in Romania

T-Index Score: 18 / 20   (20 = 100%)
T-Index
World
Average
Income Group
Average
Regional
Average
The total fulfillment of items on De Jure and De Facto adds up to 100%
on the basis of which we calculate the individual performance of a country

De Facto Transparency: 12 / 14

De Facto Components

Live, online, and freely accessible sources of public data.
These data sources were assessed as complete and freely available (1 point), partial and/or paid access (0.5 point), or missing (0 points).

Past expenditures (last fiscal year)
Yes
Current expenditures (budget tracker)
Partial
Public Procurement Portal
Yes
Land cadaster
Partial
Register of commerce
Yes
Auditor General's report
Yes
Supreme Court's hearings schedule
Yes
Supreme Court's rulings
Yes
Financial disclosures for public officials
Yes
Conflict of interest disclosures
Yes
Official Development Assistance (ODA)
Yes
Mining concessions
Yes
Building permits in the capital city
No
Official gazette
Yes

De Jure Transparency: 6 / 6

De Jure Components

Formal transparency commitments by governments.
Formal agreements that met category criteria (see Methodology) were assessed as existing (1 point) or not (0 points).

Freedom of Information Acts (FOIA)
Yes
Open Government Partnership (OGP)
Yes
United Nations Conventions Against Corruption (UNCAC)
Yes
Financial Action Task Force Against Money Laundering (or equivalent)
Yes
Plurinational transparency agreement (EITI, OECD, WTO GPA, or CPTPP)
Yes
Beneficial Ownership
Yes

Give us feedback on our sources
Please download our full dataset here
Note: Links last accessed in December 2024.

No TI data for Romania

Romania's Corruption Forecast

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Romania has only improved on e-citizenship but is stagnating at a mediocre level of judicial independence for an EU country. Its media groups have managed to maintain a decent level of freedom due to an increase in government funds after the pandemic, though this also had a negative impact on media independence from the government. Altogether, the media plays an ambiguous role; entire media outlets already belong to or are being bought by corrupt individuals, many of whom have already been sentenced to jail and are thus advocating against anti-corruption measures and against the general interest. Social media is only an extension of this moral ambiguity of traditional media. A renewed bid to join OECD might step up some reforms, but some long-standing post-communist governance features do not allow much progress. A chief problem is the extensive meddling of secret services in a variety of civilian affairs – such as organizing direct vote counting or participating in public procurement through semi-covert companies in a variety of policy areas. The result is a substantial secret segment of an otherwise transparent budget.
Components 2015 2025 Trendline
Budget Transparency 8.68 7.1 0
Judicial Independence 4.69 4.45 0
Press Freedom 7.87 6.99 0
E-Citizenship 4.47 8.37 1
Online Services 5.04 6.4 1
  positive change;   negative change;   change not statically significant.

For Budget Transparency, period considered is 2008-2019. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. Due to insufficient data on Facebook users, E-citizenship was computed as the mean of the remaining two sub-indicators (fixed broadband subscriptions and Internet users).

No Forecast data for Romania